From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riley v. Village of Ballston Spa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1902
75 App. Div. 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)

Opinion

September Term, 1902.


Judgment reversed on the ground that the damages are excessive, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event, unless the plaintiff stipulates to reduce the damages to seventy-five dollars per year, in which case the judgment as so modified is affirmed, without costs in this court. No opinion. All concurred.


Summaries of

Riley v. Village of Ballston Spa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 1, 1902
75 App. Div. 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
Case details for

Riley v. Village of Ballston Spa

Case Details

Full title:Benjamin C. Riley, Respondent, v. The Village of Ballston Spa, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 1, 1902

Citations

75 App. Div. 616 (N.Y. App. Div. 1902)
78 N.Y.S. 1135

Citing Cases

Great American Indemnity Co. v. Deatherage

In the trial of the garnishment proceedings, the court permitted the garnishee to offer evidence upon the…