From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riley v. Prudhle

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 6, 2023
2:23-cv-01511-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-01511-EFB (PC)

12-06-2023

RICO LYNTICE RILEY, Plaintiff, v. PRUDHLE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 30, 2023, the court dismissed plaintiff's complaint with leave to amend. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff seeks a 90-day extension of time to file the amended complaint. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff argues that the extension is necessary due to the complexity of the case and because prison officials have tampered with his legal mail. Id.

The court finds that a 90-day extension of time would delay the case unduly but will grant plaintiff a more limited extension of time. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's November 30, 2023 motion for extension of time (ECF No. 8) is GRANTED IN PART;
2. Plaintiff shall file his amended complaint on or before January 26, 2024; and
3. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this action.

So ordered.


Summaries of

Riley v. Prudhle

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 6, 2023
2:23-cv-01511-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Riley v. Prudhle

Case Details

Full title:RICO LYNTICE RILEY, Plaintiff, v. PRUDHLE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 6, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-01511-EFB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Dec. 6, 2023)