From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riley v. Modesto Irrigation Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
1:10-cv-02281-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)

Opinion

1:10-cv-02281-AWI-GSA

02-11-2013

RICHARD RILEY; PAMELA RILEY; VICTORIA BASSETT, Plaintiffs, v. MODESTO IRRIGATION DISTRICT; LOUIS MACEIRA; MODESTO POLICE DEPARTMENT; CITY OF MODESTO; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

AND CLOSING CASE


(Doc. 70)

The Court refers the parties to previous orders for a complete chronology of the proceedings. On February 7, 2013, plaintiffs Richard Riley, Pamela Riley and Victoria Bassett filed a notice of settlement and request for dismissal. Plaintiffs represented to the Court all parties had agreed to settle the case and requested the action be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Based on the foregoing, and for good cause shown, the Court, in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), hereby DISMISSES this action with prejudice and without an award of attorneys' fees to any party and respectfully directs the Clerk of Court to close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________

SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Riley v. Modesto Irrigation Dist.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 11, 2013
1:10-cv-02281-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Riley v. Modesto Irrigation Dist.

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD RILEY; PAMELA RILEY; VICTORIA BASSETT, Plaintiffs, v. MODESTO…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 11, 2013

Citations

1:10-cv-02281-AWI-GSA (E.D. Cal. Feb. 11, 2013)