Riley v. Marshall

Full title: CHARLES RILEY, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent.

Court: United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California, Western Division

Date published: Feb 25, 2010

CV 06-7951-JVS (AGR) (C.D. Cal. Feb. 25, 2010)

Opinion

CHARLES RILEY, Petitioner, v. JOHN MARSHALL, Warden, Respondent. No. CV 06-7951-JVS (AGR). United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division. February 25, 2010.

          ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

          JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Objections to the Report and Recommendation, and all records in the file. Having made a de novo determination, the Court agrees with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying and dismissing the petition with prejudice.