From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riley v. Doe

United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas
Dec 20, 2022
5:22-CV-5171 (W.D. Ark. Dec. 20, 2022)

Opinion

5:22-CV-5171

12-20-2022

MITCHELL DWAIN RILEY, JR. PLAINTIFF v. JOHN AND JANE DOE OFFICERS, Fayetteville Police Department DEFENDANTS


ORDER

TIMOTHY L. BROOKS, DISTRICT JUDGE

Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) of the Honorable Christy Comstock, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties.

The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds as follows: the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, the case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915A(b)(1) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff is warned that, in the future, this dismissal may be counted as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and thus, the Clerk is directed to place a § 1915(g) strike flag on the case for future judicial consideration. Further, the Court finds that any appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith.

IT IS SO ORDERED


Summaries of

Riley v. Doe

United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas
Dec 20, 2022
5:22-CV-5171 (W.D. Ark. Dec. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Riley v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:MITCHELL DWAIN RILEY, JR. PLAINTIFF v. JOHN AND JANE DOE OFFICERS…

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas

Date published: Dec 20, 2022

Citations

5:22-CV-5171 (W.D. Ark. Dec. 20, 2022)