From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rigsbee v. Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
May 26, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-135 (S.D. Ohio May. 26, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 3:09-cv-135.

May 26, 2009


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #3), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petition herein is DISMISSED with prejudice.


Summaries of

Rigsbee v. Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
May 26, 2009
Case No. 3:09-cv-135 (S.D. Ohio May. 26, 2009)
Case details for

Rigsbee v. Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women

Case Details

Full title:Cheryl Lyn Rigsbee, Plaintiff, v. Warden Ohio Reformatory for Women…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: May 26, 2009

Citations

Case No. 3:09-cv-135 (S.D. Ohio May. 26, 2009)