From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rigor v. Fremont Inv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION
Aug 23, 2012
Case No. 6:12-CV-00573 (D. Or. Aug. 23, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 6:12-CV-00573

08-23-2012

ANNE L. RIGOR, Plaintiff, v. FREMONT INVESTMENT and LOAN; JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; JP MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP.; JP MORGAN ACCEPTANCE CORP.; US BANK, NA, TRUSTEE FOR JP MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION CORP.; NORTHWEST TRUSTEE SERVICES, INC.; and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants.


ORDER

The parties were ordered to show cause in writing why USDC Case No. 6:11-cv-6332-HO, Rigor v. Fremont Investment et al, should not be dismissed as redundant. Defendants have responded that they do not oppose the dismissal. [#18]. To date plaintiff has not responded.

Defendants were also ordered to show cause why their Motions to Dismiss [#5; #10] should not therefore be dismissed as moot. [#16]. Defendants agree that, with the dismissal of Case No. 11-6332-HO, their Motions to Dismiss [#5; #10] are moot. [#18].

Conclusion

USDC Case No. 6:11-cv-6332-HO is hereby DISMISSED as redundant. Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [#5; #10] are DENIED as moot. IT IS SO ORDERED

_________________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rigor v. Fremont Inv.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION
Aug 23, 2012
Case No. 6:12-CV-00573 (D. Or. Aug. 23, 2012)
Case details for

Rigor v. Fremont Inv.

Case Details

Full title:ANNE L. RIGOR, Plaintiff, v. FREMONT INVESTMENT and LOAN; JP MORGAN CHASE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION

Date published: Aug 23, 2012

Citations

Case No. 6:12-CV-00573 (D. Or. Aug. 23, 2012)