From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riethmiller v. U.S. Electoral Coll.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Feb 4, 2013
Case No. 12-cv-363-PB (D.N.H. Feb. 4, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 12-cv-363-PB

02-04-2013

Annamarie D. Riethmiller v. US Electoral College, et al


ORDER

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Landya B. McCafferty dated December 12, 2012. "'[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.'" School Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quoting Keating v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 271, 275 (1st Cir.1988)); see also United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

SO ORDERED.

______________

Paul Barbadoro

United States District Judge
cc: Annamarie Riethmiller, Pro se


Summaries of

Riethmiller v. U.S. Electoral Coll.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE
Feb 4, 2013
Case No. 12-cv-363-PB (D.N.H. Feb. 4, 2013)
Case details for

Riethmiller v. U.S. Electoral Coll.

Case Details

Full title:Annamarie D. Riethmiller v. US Electoral College, et al

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE

Date published: Feb 4, 2013

Citations

Case No. 12-cv-363-PB (D.N.H. Feb. 4, 2013)

Citing Cases

Byrne Organization, Inc. v. United States

Persons dealing with the Government must take notice of the extent of the authority which the Government has…