From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riedel v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Oct 20, 2022
No. 13-22-00112-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 20, 2022)

Opinion

13-22-00112-CR

10-20-2022

KENNETH WARREN RIEDEL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.


Do not publish. Tex.R.App.P. 47.2(b).

On appeal from the 25th District Court of Gonzales County, Texas.

Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Before the Court is appellant's pro se motion for access to the appellate record. On September 9, 2022, appellant's counsel filed an Anders brief, and appellant has been unable to examine the record in order to file a pro se brief. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967).

Accordingly, we grant appellant's motion. We order the trial court to ensure that appellant has the opportunity to fully examine the appellate record on or before thirty days from the date of this order. We further order the trial court to notify this Court as to the date upon which the appellate record was made available to appellant. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 321-22 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

Appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the day the appellate record is first made available to him to file his pro se brief with this Court. The State shall have twenty days thereafter to file its response, if any.


Summaries of

Riedel v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg
Oct 20, 2022
No. 13-22-00112-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 20, 2022)
Case details for

Riedel v. State

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH WARREN RIEDEL, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Thirteenth District, Corpus Christi-Edinburg

Date published: Oct 20, 2022

Citations

No. 13-22-00112-CR (Tex. App. Oct. 20, 2022)