From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ridenour v. Collins

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
May 11, 2009
Case No. 2:08-cv-682 (S.D. Ohio May. 11, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. 2:08-cv-682.

May 11, 2009


ORDER


This case is before the Court to consider a Report and Recommendation issued by the Magistrate Judge on April 13, 2009. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. The motion for judgment on the pleadings (#16) is denied as it relates to Mr. Ridenour's federal law claims, and granted as it relates to his state law claims, if any. The defendants' motion to stay discovery (#17) is denied. Mr. Ridenour's motion to compel discovery (#18) and his objection to the Magistrate Judge's order granting an extension of time (#40) are denied as moot.


Summaries of

Ridenour v. Collins

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
May 11, 2009
Case No. 2:08-cv-682 (S.D. Ohio May. 11, 2009)
Case details for

Ridenour v. Collins

Case Details

Full title:William L. Ridenour, Plaintiff, v. Terry Collins, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: May 11, 2009

Citations

Case No. 2:08-cv-682 (S.D. Ohio May. 11, 2009)