From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Riddle v. Warden, Mansfield Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 25, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cr-99 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 25, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:11-cr-99

03-25-2013

RODNEY RIDDLE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Mansfield Correctional Institution Respondent.


Chief Judge Susan J. Dlott

Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz


SUPPLEMENT TO ORDER FOR ANSWER

In this habeas corpus case filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, the Court issued on March 6, 2013, an Order for Answer to the Respondent Warden (Doc. No. 103). The Order requires that the Warden file the state court record before filing the Answer, thereby obtaining a distinctive PageID on each page of the filed state court record. The Order also requires that "[a]ll papers filed in the case thereafter, by either party, including the answer and the exhibit index, shall include record references to the PageID number." (Order, Doc. No. 103, PageID 804).

In order to ensure that the Petitioner is able to comply with this directive, the Order for Answer is hereby SUPPLEMENTED as follows: the copy of the state court record served by Respondent on the Petitioner shall include the PageID numbers. This is necessary because pro se litigants do not have access to the electronic case file for preparation of filings.

Michael R. Merz

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Riddle v. Warden, Mansfield Corr. Inst.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Mar 25, 2013
Case No. 1:11-cr-99 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 25, 2013)
Case details for

Riddle v. Warden, Mansfield Corr. Inst.

Case Details

Full title:RODNEY RIDDLE, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, Mansfield Correctional Institution…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Mar 25, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:11-cr-99 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 25, 2013)