From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rickus v. Blanckensee

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Apr 17, 2023
No. CV-20-00328-TUC-JCH (D. Ariz. Apr. 17, 2023)

Opinion

CV-20-00328-TUC-JCH

04-17-2023

Eric Rickus, Petitioner, v. Barbara Blanckensee, Respondent.


ORDER

John C. Hinderaker, United States District Judge

Incarcerated pro se Petitioner seeks to compel the Bureau of Prisons to credit his federal sentence with time he spent in federal custody under a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum. Doc. 1. The Court referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Bruce G. Macdonald for a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"). Doc. 8. The R&R recommends dismissing Petitioner's Petition because the Bureau of Prisons correctly calculated Petitioner's sentence, and he is not entitled to the relief he seeks. Doc. 33 at 5. Neither party objected to Judge Macdonald's R&R. See generally docket.

A district court reviews objected-to portions of an R&R de novo. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b); United States v. Remsing, 874 F.2d 614, 617 (9th Cir. 1989). Failure to timely object may be considered a waiver of a party's right to de novo consideration of the issues. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 112122 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc).

After independent review, the Court agrees with the R&R's analysis and conclusion.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED ADOPTING IN FULL the R&R (Doc. 33).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED DISMISSING the Petition (Doc. 1). The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close this case.


Summaries of

Rickus v. Blanckensee

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Apr 17, 2023
No. CV-20-00328-TUC-JCH (D. Ariz. Apr. 17, 2023)
Case details for

Rickus v. Blanckensee

Case Details

Full title:Eric Rickus, Petitioner, v. Barbara Blanckensee, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Apr 17, 2023

Citations

No. CV-20-00328-TUC-JCH (D. Ariz. Apr. 17, 2023)