From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rickett v. City of Fairborn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 20, 2013
Case No. 3:11-cv-0370 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 20, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-0370

03-20-2013

LINDA RICKETT Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FAIRBORN, et. al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL: TERMINATION ENTRY

The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above matter has been settled, IT IS ORDERED that this action is hereby DISMISSED, with prejudice as to the parties, provided that any of the parties may, upon good cause shown within 60 days, reopen the action if settlement is not consummated.

Parties intending to preserve this Court's jurisdiction to enforce the settlement should be aware of Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of America, 114 S.Ct. 1673 (1994), and incorporate appropriate language in any substituted judgment entry.

The Court will retain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the settlement between the parties, if necessary.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________________

WALTER HERBERT RICE, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Copies to: All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Rickett v. City of Fairborn

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 20, 2013
Case No. 3:11-cv-0370 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Rickett v. City of Fairborn

Case Details

Full title:LINDA RICKETT Plaintiff, v. CITY OF FAIRBORN, et. al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 20, 2013

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-0370 (S.D. Ohio Mar. 20, 2013)