From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rick v. Harpstead

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Aug 21, 2020
Case No. 19-CV-2827 (NEB/DTS) (D. Minn. Aug. 21, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 19-CV-2827 (NEB/DTS)

08-21-2020

DARRIN SCOTT RICK, Petitioner, v. JODI HARPSTEAD, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has received the July 24, 2020 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David Schultz. (ECF No. 35.) No party has objected to that Report and Recommendation, and the Court therefore reviews it for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam). Finding no clear error, and based upon all the files, records, and proceedings in the above-captioned matter, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 35) is ACCEPTED; and

2. Respondent's motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 12, 16) are DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Dated: August 21, 2020

BY THE COURT:

s/Nancy E. Brasel

Nancy E. Brasel

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rick v. Harpstead

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Aug 21, 2020
Case No. 19-CV-2827 (NEB/DTS) (D. Minn. Aug. 21, 2020)
Case details for

Rick v. Harpstead

Case Details

Full title:DARRIN SCOTT RICK, Petitioner, v. JODI HARPSTEAD, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Aug 21, 2020

Citations

Case No. 19-CV-2827 (NEB/DTS) (D. Minn. Aug. 21, 2020)