From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richmond v. Chrysler Grp. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 4, 2018
No. 3:16-cv-1936-PK (D. Or. May. 4, 2018)

Opinion

No. 3:16-cv-1936-PK

05-04-2018

BETH RICHMOND, Plaintiff, v. CHRYSLER GROUP LLC and JAKE SWEENEY CHRYSLER JEEP DODGE INC., Defendants.


ORDER :

Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued a Findings and Recommendation ("F&R") [34] on March 27, 2018, in which he recommends that the Court grant Defendant Chrysler Group LLC's ("FCA") Motion for Summary Judgment [23].

The entity that Plaintiff identifies as "Chrysler Group LLC" is properly denominated as "FCA US LLC." --------

Because neither party timely filed an objection to the Magistrate Judge's F&R, the Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court finds no error.

CONCLUSION

The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's F&R [34]. Accordingly, Defendant FCA's Motion for Summary Judgment [23] is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED this 4 day of May, 2018.

/s/_________

MARCO A. HERNÁNDEZ

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Richmond v. Chrysler Grp. LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
May 4, 2018
No. 3:16-cv-1936-PK (D. Or. May. 4, 2018)
Case details for

Richmond v. Chrysler Grp. LLC

Case Details

Full title:BETH RICHMOND, Plaintiff, v. CHRYSLER GROUP LLC and JAKE SWEENEY CHRYSLER…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: May 4, 2018

Citations

No. 3:16-cv-1936-PK (D. Or. May. 4, 2018)