From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richman v. Fleisher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 1948
274 App. Div. 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

December 13, 1948.

Present — Glennon, J.P., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Shientag, JJ.


The appellants' brief points out that the defendants Henry Pearce and Jules Mayer, who were formerly managing agents of the building in question, had no privity whatsoever therewith during the period here involved. The brief of the plaintiff admits that as to said defendants the action has been discontinued. The attorney for the plaintiff has submitted a stipulation discontinuing the action, so far as the plaintiff is concerned, against the defendants, Pearce and Mayer. Order unanimously modified by excluding from its provisions the defendants, Pearce and Mayer, and by reducing the total fine as to the remaining defendants to the sum of $250, and as so modified affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. Settle order on notice.


Summaries of

Richman v. Fleisher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 13, 1948
274 App. Div. 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Richman v. Fleisher

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS RICHMAN, Individually and in Behalf of All the Tenants, Similarly…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 13, 1948

Citations

274 App. Div. 983 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)