From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richey v. Warner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jun 24, 2014
CASE NO. C14-5159 BHS-JRC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 24, 2014)

Opinion

CASE NO. C14-5159 BHS-JRC

06-24-2014

THOMAS WILLIAMSINCLAIR RICHEY, Plaintiff, v. BERNARD WARNER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT

AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable J. Richard Creatura, United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 23), and Plaintiff Thomas Williamsinclair Richey's ("Richey") objections to the R&R (Dkt. 24).

On May 16, 2014, Judge Creatura issued the R&R recommending that the Court deny Richey's motion for a temporary restraining order because, in part, Richey has failed to show the denial of a basic human need such as food or shelter. Dkt. 23. On May 23, 2014, Richey filed objections arguing that he suffers an irreparable injury every time another prisoner is provided "free, extra food . . . ." Dkt. 24 at 2. The Court disagrees with Richey and concludes that the denial of free extra food is not an irreparable injury sufficient to justify preliminary relief.

Therefore, the Court having considered the R&R, Richey's objections, and the remaining record, does hereby find and order as follows:

(1) The R&R is ADOPTED; and

(2) Richey's motion for preliminary relief (Dkt. 7) is DENIED.

__________

BENJAMIN H. SETTLE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Richey v. Warner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jun 24, 2014
CASE NO. C14-5159 BHS-JRC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 24, 2014)
Case details for

Richey v. Warner

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS WILLIAMSINCLAIR RICHEY, Plaintiff, v. BERNARD WARNER, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Jun 24, 2014

Citations

CASE NO. C14-5159 BHS-JRC (W.D. Wash. Jun. 24, 2014)