Richardson v. Warden Outlaw

Full title: ANDREW RICHARDSON v. WARDEN OUTLAW, ET AL

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Beaumont Division

Date published: Dec 13, 2006

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv667 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 13, 2006)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:06cv667.

December 13, 2006

MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

RONALD CLARK, District Judge

Plaintiff Andrew Richardson, an inmate at the Federal Correctional Complex in Beaumont, Texas, proceeding pro se, brought this Bivens-type action.¹

1 See Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Earl S. Hines, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The magistrate judge recommends this action be dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies.

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, pleadings and all available evidence. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate judge are correct and the report of the magistrate judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the magistrate judge's recommendations.

So ORDERED and SIGNED.