From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Sep 23, 1985
695 S.W.2d 379 (Ark. 1985)

Opinion

Opinion delivered September 23, 1985

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk; denied.

Carl J. Madsen, P.A., by: Mark A. Colbert, for appellant.

No response.


The appellant has moved for a rule on the clerk to permit the late filing of the record and docketing of appeal in this criminal case.

Although the motion states "the attorney" miscalculated the time for perfecting the appeal, it does not say who the responsible attorney was.

We will grant the rule on the clerk and permit the docketing of the appeal upon receipt of a proper motion accompanied by an affidavit from an attorney accepting responsibility for the failure to file the record on time. See per curiam order of February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964.

Motion denied.

PURTLE, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Richardson v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Sep 23, 1985
695 S.W.2d 379 (Ark. 1985)
Case details for

Richardson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Avery Nathan RICHARDSON v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 23, 1985

Citations

695 S.W.2d 379 (Ark. 1985)
695 S.W.2d 379