From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 27, 1993
624 So. 2d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Opinion

No. 92-3330.

September 27, 1993.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Leon County, William L. Gary, J.

Robert C. Richardson, pro se.

No appearance for appellee.


Robert C. Richardson appeals a final order summarily denying the relief he requested by motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 or, in the alternative, petition for writ of habeas corpus.

We affirm the trial court's denial of 3.850 relief, because the two-year time limitation under that rule has long since expired, as Richardson's judgment and sentence became final March 8, 1982.

We vacate, however, the trial court's order with regard to Richardson's claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, because the circuit court did not have jurisdiction to rule on those issues. Knight v. State, 394 So.2d 997 (Fla. 1981); Wright v. State, 610 So.2d 118 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Richardson must raise such a claim by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the appellate court that heard his direct appeal, which in his case was the Florida Supreme Court. Richardson v. State, 437 So.2d 1091 (Fla. 1983).

AFFIRMED in part and VACATED in part.

JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Richardson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Sep 27, 1993
624 So. 2d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)
Case details for

Richardson v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT C. RICHARDSON, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Sep 27, 1993

Citations

624 So. 2d 804 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1993)

Citing Cases

Wright v. State

Affirmed. See Bailey v. State, 886 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Wilson v. State, 845 So.2d 236 (Fla. 2d…

State v. Riechmann

Ineffective assistance of counsel claims must be raised in the court in which the alleged ineffectiveness…