From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 13, 2020
No. 19-CV-1408-LTS-SLC (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2020)

Opinion

No. 19-CV-1408-LTS-SLC

10-13-2020

MILTON WADE RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER

The Court has reviewed Judge Cave's September 25, 2020, Report and Recommendation (the "Report"), which recommends that Plaintiff's counsel's motion for attorneys' fees be granted. Specifically, the Report recommends that attorneys' fees be awarded in the amount of $24,240.40, which represents 25 percent of past due benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 406(b). The Report also recommends that Plaintiff's attorney be ordered to refund directly to Plaintiff the previously-awarded fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, of $6,600.00. Defendant did not oppose Plaintiff's motion (see Docket Entry No. 27), and no objections to the Report have been received.

In reviewing a report and recommendation, a district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) (Westlaw through P.L. 116-163). When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, "a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no 'clear error on the face of the record' in order to accept the recommendation." Alpha Capital Anstalt v. Shiftpixy, Inc., 432 F. Supp. 3d 326, 330 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) (quoting Austin v. Lynch, No. 10-CV-7534, 2011 WL 6399622, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2011)).

The Court has reviewed carefully Magistrate Judge Cave's Report and Recommendation and finds no clear error. The Court therefore adopts the Report in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, the motion for attorneys' fees is granted, in the amount of $24,240.40, and Plaintiff's counsel is ordered to refund directly to Plaintiff the previously awarded EAJA fees of $6,600.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate Docket Entry No. 23.

SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York

October 13, 2020

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Richardson v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 13, 2020
No. 19-CV-1408-LTS-SLC (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2020)
Case details for

Richardson v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:MILTON WADE RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 13, 2020

Citations

No. 19-CV-1408-LTS-SLC (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 13, 2020)

Citing Cases

Sink v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

1) whether the attorney's efforts were particularly successful for the plaintiff, 2) whether there is…