From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Michigan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 30, 2012
CASE NO. 12-12750 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 30, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO. 12-12750

07-30-2012

DONALD RICHARDSON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al, Respondent.


HONORABLE GEORGE CARAM STEEH


OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING ACTION UNDER

FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(A)(1)

This is a pro se civil rights action filed by a Michigan state prisoner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff's complaint essentially claims that the Michigan Department of Treasury wrongfully withheld pension payments for a period of nine months, causing his wife to lose the marital home. Another complaint, making the same allegations, was filed with this Court under Case No. 2:12-cv-12362, and an order directing service on the defendants has already been entered. Plaintiff has filed a letter with the Court asking that Case No. 2:12-cv-12750-for which there is an outstanding deficiency order-be voluntarily dismissed.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) provides that "the plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing; (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared." FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i), (ii). The Court has no discretion to deny a voluntary dismissal so long as notice of the dismissal is filed before an answer or motion for summary judgment is served. Aamot v. Kassel, 1 F.3d 441, 443 (6th Cir.1993). Because the defendants have not even been served with the complaint, the Court will grant Plaintiff's request to dismiss the action.

Accordingly, the Court orders that the complaint is voluntarily dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

________________

GEORGE CARAM STEEH

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Copies of this Order were served upon attorneys of record and upon Donald Richardson #719076, Carson City Correctional Facility, 10274 Boyer Road, Carson City, MI 48811, on July 30, 2012, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.

Barbara Radke

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Richardson v. Michigan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jul 30, 2012
CASE NO. 12-12750 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 30, 2012)
Case details for

Richardson v. Michigan

Case Details

Full title:DONALD RICHARDSON, Petitioner, v. STATE OF MICHIGAN, et al, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 30, 2012

Citations

CASE NO. 12-12750 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 30, 2012)