Summary
In Richardson, the court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment where the plaintiff failed “to exhaust his administrative remedies, both by failing to file timely and by failing to complete the grievance process through appeal.
Summary of this case from Gibson v. City of CincinnatiOpinion
Case No. 1:08cv600.
February 3, 2010
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation filed by the Magistrate Judge on January 11, 2010 (Doc. 41).
Proper notice has been given to the parties under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), including notice that the parties would waive further appeal if they failed to file objections to the Report and Recommendation in a timely manner. See United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). No objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation have been filed.
Having reviewed this matter de novo pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, this Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to be correct.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 30) is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Motion to Convey (Doc. 26); Plaintiff's Motion in Limine (Doc. 33) are DENIED as Moot. Defendant's Motion to Strike (Doc. 36) is DENIED as Moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Exhibit