Opinion
Case No. C-3:09-cv-455
2013-10-08
EARL RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, et al., Defendants.
Judge Thomas M. Rose
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
ENTRY AND ORDER OVERRULING RICHARDSON'S OBJECTIONS
(Doc. #35) TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATIONS; ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. #34) IN ITS ENTIRETY;
AND DENYING RICHARDSON'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO
RELEASE COMPENSATION AND BENEFITS
Pro Se Plaintiff Earl Richardson ("Richardson") has filed a Motion for an Order To Release Compensation and Benefits. (Doc. #33.) On September 3, 2013, Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz issued a Report and Recommendations recommending that this Motion be denied for reasons already given in the companion case, Richardson v. Dayton Public Schools, Case No. 3:10-cv-028, at Docs. #50 and #52. Richardson subsequently objected (doc. #35) and the time has run and no Defendant has responded to Richardson's Objection. This matter is, therefore, ripe for decision.
As required by 28 U.S.C. §636(b) and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 72(b), the District Judge has made a de novo review of the record in this case. Upon said review, the Court finds that Richardson's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations are not well-taken, and they are hereby OVERRULED. The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations is adopted in its entirety. Richardson's Motion for an Order To Release Compensation and Benefits (doc. #33) is denied.
DONE and ORDERED in Dayton, Ohio, this Eighth Day of October, 2013.
________________________
THOMAS M. ROSE
UNITED STATED DISTRICT JUDGE
Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record
Earl Richardson at his last address of record