From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Geren

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 19, 2010
370 F. App'x 385 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-2201.

Submitted: March 16, 2010.

Decided: March 19, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (1:08-cv-03121-CCB).

Johnny D. Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Johnny D. Richardson appeals the district court's order granting the Appellee's motion to dismiss Richardson's complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Richardson v. Geren, No. 1:08-cv-03121-CCB (D.Md. May 8, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Richardson v. Geren

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Mar 19, 2010
370 F. App'x 385 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Richardson v. Geren

Case Details

Full title:Johnny D. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Pete GEREN, Secretary of the…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Mar 19, 2010

Citations

370 F. App'x 385 (4th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Richardson v. McHugh

And, second, it found that the term "calendar days" was not ambiguous, and therefore the contract was not…