From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richardson v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 13, 2017
No. 73750 (Nev. Oct. 13, 2017)

Opinion

No. 73750

10-13-2017

THOMAS RICHARDSON, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MICHELLE LEAVITT, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, and THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.


ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original petition seeks a writ of mandamus directing that petitioner's pending postconviction proceedings be assigned to a different district court judge. Having reviewed the petition, we are not convinced that petitioner has met his burden of demonstrating that our intervention is warranted at this time. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); see also Round Hill Gen. Imp. Dist. v. Newman, 97 Nev. 601, 637 P.2d 534 (1981). We therefore

ORDER the petition DENIED.

/s/_________, J.

Hardesty /s/_________, J.
Parraguirre /s/_________, J.
Stiglich cc: Hon. Michelle Leavitt, District Judge

Dayvid J. Figler

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Richardson v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Oct 13, 2017
No. 73750 (Nev. Oct. 13, 2017)
Case details for

Richardson v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev.

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS RICHARDSON, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF…

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Oct 13, 2017

Citations

No. 73750 (Nev. Oct. 13, 2017)