Opinion
December 4, 1997
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.).
Viewed in the light most favorable to the prevailing party ( Heller v. 83rd St. Investors Ltd. Partnership, 228 A.D.2d 371, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 815), the evidence supports the jury's finding that defendants' negligence was not a proximate cause of plaintiff's injuries. The conflict in expert opinion as to whether plaintiff's disc herniation resulted from the trauma of the accident or was a degenerative condition, like other questions of credibility, was for the jury to resolve ( supra, at 372). There is no merit to plaintiff's unpreserved argument that defendants advanced several theories on the issue of proximate cause some of which were not supported by the evidence, and that the general verdict is therefore defective, since defendants did not have the burden of proof on the issue of proximate cause, advanced no affirmative defenses on which they did have a burden of proof, and their "theories" did no more than challenge the credibility of plaintiff's case ( compare, Davis v. Caldwell, 54 N.Y.2d 176).
Nor did the trial court err in denying a missing witness charge with respect to defendant driver since, a verdict with respect to negligence having been directed, the driver could not have had anything material to say. We have considered plaintiff's other contentions and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Murphy, P.J., Sullivan, Tom, Mazzarelli and Colabella, JJ.