From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Richards v. Crocker

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 22, 1894
37 N.E. 827 (N.Y. 1894)

Summary

In Richards v. Levi, 67 Tex. 364, Judge Gaines, for the court, says: "The clear deduction from the cases cited is, that in order to charge a purchaser with notice of an unrecorded instrument, a secret lien, or equity, by reason of the character of the deed under which he claims, that deed must purport to convey and quitclaim to the purchaser no more than the right, title, or interest of the grantor."

Summary of this case from Threadgill v. Bickerstaff

Opinion

Argued June 7, 1894

Decided June 22, 1894

S.C. Millard for appellants.

D.S. Richards for respondent.


Agree to affirm on opinion below.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Richards v. Crocker

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 22, 1894
37 N.E. 827 (N.Y. 1894)

In Richards v. Levi, 67 Tex. 364, Judge Gaines, for the court, says: "The clear deduction from the cases cited is, that in order to charge a purchaser with notice of an unrecorded instrument, a secret lien, or equity, by reason of the character of the deed under which he claims, that deed must purport to convey and quitclaim to the purchaser no more than the right, title, or interest of the grantor."

Summary of this case from Threadgill v. Bickerstaff
Case details for

Richards v. Crocker

Case Details

Full title:DAN. S. RICHARDS, Respondent, v . LEVI CROCKER et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 22, 1894

Citations

37 N.E. 827 (N.Y. 1894)
37 N.E. 827
60 N.Y. St. Rptr. 875

Citing Cases

Threadgill v. Bickerstaff

Duren v. Railway, 86 Tex. 291. The main question in this case arises upon the action of the trial court in…