From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rich v. Twin Parks Northeast Associates, LP

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 8, 2014
117 A.D.3d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-05-8

Washika RICH, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. TWIN PARKS NORTHEAST ASSOCIATES, LP, et al., Defendants–Appellants. [And A Third–Party Action].

Gannon, Rosenfarb, Balletti & Drossman, New York (Jason B. Rosenfarb of counsel), for appellants. Zlotolow & Associates, P.C., Sayville (Jason S. Firestein of counsel), for respondent.



Gannon, Rosenfarb, Balletti & Drossman, New York (Jason B. Rosenfarb of counsel), for appellants. Zlotolow & Associates, P.C., Sayville (Jason S. Firestein of counsel), for respondent.
SAXE, J.P., MOSKOWITZ, FREEDMAN, GISCHE, KAPNICK, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alison Y. Tuitt, J.), entered October 30, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff seeks damages for injuries she suffered when she slipped on a wet substance on the stairs of premises owned and managed by defendants. She testified that she observed trash and liquid on the stairs some 13 hours before her fall, and that the staircase had been in that condition the entire weekend preceding the accident. The investigation that immediately followed the accident found that there was urine on the stairs where plaintiff fell.

Defendants failed to establish that they lacked notice of the dangerous condition on the stairs ( see Bowie v. 2377 Creston Realty, LLC, 14 A.D.3d 457, 459, 788 N.Y.S.2d 375 [1st Dept.2005]; Harrison v. New York City Tr. Auth., 94 A.D.3d 512, 514, 941 N.Y.S.2d 622 [1st Dept.2012] ). They submitted no evidence of the actual condition of the stairs at the time of, or in the hours preceding, plaintiff's accident, or that the janitorial schedule was followed on the date of the accident.


Summaries of

Rich v. Twin Parks Northeast Associates, LP

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
May 8, 2014
117 A.D.3d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Rich v. Twin Parks Northeast Associates, LP

Case Details

Full title:Washika RICH, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. TWIN PARKS NORTHEAST ASSOCIATES…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: May 8, 2014

Citations

117 A.D.3d 482 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 3345
986 N.Y.S.2d 50

Citing Cases

Echevarria v. W. Beef, Inc.

Defendant has met the prima facie burden for summary judgment. Plaintiff has failed to offer any proof…

Carela v. N.Y.C. Transit Auth.

Transit's cleaner in the instant action, Mr. Hamilton, testified that he performed his usual routine, which…