From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rich v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Nov 8, 2023
No. 8993-21 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 8, 2023)

Opinion

8993-21

11-08-2023

ASHLEY KINCAID RICH & MICHAEL WILLIAM RICH, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent


ORDER OF DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION

Kathleen Kerrigan Chief Judge

On November 6, 2023, respondent filed in the above-docketed case a Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction, on the ground that respondent was unable to prove that a valid notice of deficiency, as authorized by section 6212 and required by section 6213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code to form the basis for a petition to this Court, had been mailed to petitioners with respect to taxable year 2017. In the motion to dismiss, respondent explained that despite repeated efforts, respondent is unable to supply a copy of any such notice, citing Pietanza v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 729 (1989), aff 'd, 935 F.2d 1282 (3d Cir. 1991). Respondent further indicated that petitioners had no objection to the granting of the motion.

Upon due consideration, it is

ORDERED that respondent's Motion To Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is granted, and this case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the purported notice of deficiency is invalid.


Summaries of

Rich v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

United States Tax Court
Nov 8, 2023
No. 8993-21 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 8, 2023)
Case details for

Rich v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

Case Details

Full title:ASHLEY KINCAID RICH & MICHAEL WILLIAM RICH, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF…

Court:United States Tax Court

Date published: Nov 8, 2023

Citations

No. 8993-21 (U.S.T.C. Nov. 8, 2023)