Opinion
8:22-cv-00126-SSS-KESx
07-27-2022
John Curtis Rice v. Tinh Hoa Corporation
Present: The Honorable SUNSHINE S. SYKES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL
Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS COURT'S REASSIGNMENT ORDER
On June 25, 2022, the Court entered its Reassignment Order (the “Order”) [Dkt. 23], that 1) informed the parties of the case reassignment; 2) provided this Court's location; 3) provided the parties vital information on previously scheduled deadlines and dates and how this Court would be addressing those deadlines and dates; 4) directed each party to review and become familiar with any all applicable standing orders; and 5) ordered the parties to file a joint case management statement within fifteen days from the date of the Order. As of today's date, Plaintiff has failed to file the Court-ordered case management statement.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS counsel for Plaintiff-Craig B. Sanders- to show cause why he should not each be sanctioned in the amount of $250 for his failure to comply with the Court's Reassignment Order.
Counsel is required to respond in writing on or before August 10, 2022, at 12:00 noon. Counsel's failure to respond, or counsel's filing of an unsatisfactory response, may result in the imposition of sanctions against counsel.
IT IS SO ORDERED.