From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rice v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 14, 1912
124 P. 67 (Okla. 1912)

Opinion

No. 1539

Opinion Filed May 14, 1912.

APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal — Failure to File Brief. Where plaintiff in error files no brief, as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Syllabus by Rosser, C.)

Error from District Court, McClain County; R. McMillan, Judge.

Action by C. T. Rice and A. M. Wilbern against C. R. Jones and J. H. Colby. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error. Dismissed.

Rennie, Hocker Moore, for plaintiffs in error.

J. F. Sharp, for defendants in error.


The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court March 9, 1910. Plaintiffs in error have failed to file brief in the case. Petition in error should, therefore, be dismissed for want of prosecution. Hass v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormick, 27 Okla. 779, 117 P. 200; McClelland v. Witherall, 30 Okla. 287, 119 P. 205; Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296, 119 P. 205; Bender v. Bender, 30 Okla. 288, 119 P. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.


Summaries of

Rice v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma
May 14, 1912
124 P. 67 (Okla. 1912)
Case details for

Rice v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:RICE et al. v. JONES et al

Court:Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Date published: May 14, 1912

Citations

124 P. 67 (Okla. 1912)
124 P. 67

Citing Cases

HUKILL ET AL. v. THARP ET AL

The petition in error and case-made was filed in this court January 9, 1911. Plaintiffs in error have filed…

Boyd v. Webb Queensware Co.

Since he has failed to comply with rule 7 of this court (38 Okla. vi, 95 Pac. vi) by filing briefs, his…