From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ricci v. Memorial Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 3, 1994
209 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

November 3, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Kahn, J.).


Control of disclosure is within the sphere of the trial court's broad discretionary power and, absent abuse, should not be disturbed (see, Dunlap v. United Health Servs., 189 A.D.2d 1072; Soper v. Wilkinson Match [USA], 176 A.D.2d 1025). Applying this principle here, we affirm since we agree with Supreme Court that defendant did not establish the necessity for a second physical examination and, more particularly, a psychiatric examination of plaintiff Shirleen A. Ricci.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Mercure and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Ricci v. Memorial Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Nov 3, 1994
209 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Ricci v. Memorial Hospital

Case Details

Full title:SHIRLEEN A. RICCI et al., Respondents, v. MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Nov 3, 1994

Citations

209 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
618 N.Y.S.2d 589

Citing Cases

Washburn v. A.W. Lawrence Company, Inc.

Supreme Court denied this motion and defendant now appeals. We affirm. It is well settled that the "[c]ontrol…

Santiago v. Pyramid Crossgates Company

Plaintiff appeals. Control of disclosure is within the sphere of the trial court's broad discretionary power…