Opinion
November 3, 1994
Appeal from the Supreme Court, Albany County (Kahn, J.).
Control of disclosure is within the sphere of the trial court's broad discretionary power and, absent abuse, should not be disturbed (see, Dunlap v. United Health Servs., 189 A.D.2d 1072; Soper v. Wilkinson Match [USA], 176 A.D.2d 1025). Applying this principle here, we affirm since we agree with Supreme Court that defendant did not establish the necessity for a second physical examination and, more particularly, a psychiatric examination of plaintiff Shirleen A. Ricci.
Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Mercure and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.