From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rials v. Lozano

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 7, 2022
2:19-cv-2152 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2022)

Opinion

2:19-cv-2152 TLN CKD P

04-07-2022

JAMES ALEXANDER RIALS, Plaintiff, v. J. LOZANO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff filed a motion for extension of time to file an opposition to defendants' January 6, 2022, motion for summary judgment. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 72) is granted.

2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file and serve any opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No. further extensions of time will be granted.

3. Failure to file an opposition within the time provided will result in dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Rials v. Lozano

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 7, 2022
2:19-cv-2152 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Rials v. Lozano

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ALEXANDER RIALS, Plaintiff, v. J. LOZANO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 7, 2022

Citations

2:19-cv-2152 TLN CKD P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 7, 2022)