Opinion
No. 92-3770.
March 16, 1995.
Thomas J. Lutkewitte, J. Paul Demarest, Favret, Demarest, Russo Lutkewitte, New Orleans, LA, Felix J. Springer, Day, Berry Howard, Hartford, CT, for appellant.
Joseph L. Waitz, Waitz Downer, Houma, LA, for appellee.
Dori K. Bernstein, EEOC, Office of Gen. Counsel, Washington, DC, for amicus curiae.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana; Alma Chasez, Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion November 23, 1994, 5 Cir., 1994, 39 F.3d 537)
Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, KING, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, DUHE, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.