From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. Diamond

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 14, 2010
CIVIL NO. 09-1302 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 14, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 09-1302.

July 14, 2010


ORDER


AND NOW, this 14h day of July, 2010, upon consideration of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 2), Plaintiffs' Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 3), Defendants' Reply (Doc. No. 5), Plaintiffs' Notice of Consent Judgment and Order in the matter of Federal Trade Commission v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., No. 10-4193 (C.D. Cal. June 7, 2010) (Doc. No. 12), and Defendants' Supplemental Memorandum of Law in Response thereto (Doc. No. 14), it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that Defendants' Motion is GRANTED and Plaintiffs' Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

It is further ORDERED and DECREED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 8) is hereby DENIED AS MOOT.

Subsequent to the conclusion of briefing regarding Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 8) and Defendants filed an Opposition thereto (Doc. No. 9). This Court has reviewed same and is of the opinion that in light of the reasons for granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, amendment would be futile.


Summaries of

Rhodes v. Diamond

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 14, 2010
CIVIL NO. 09-1302 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 14, 2010)
Case details for

Rhodes v. Diamond

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS A. RHODES; GERALD A. BENDER; and, EDWARD H. WOLFERD, JR.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 14, 2010

Citations

CIVIL NO. 09-1302 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 14, 2010)

Citing Cases

Shaw v. Hayt, Hayt & Landau, LLC

One year after the Supreme Court's decision in Heintz, Congress amended the FDCPA, creating a carve-out to…

Rhodes v. Diamond

The District Court dismissed the complaint with prejudice, finding that PHS's "failure to promptly amend…