From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. Cal. Dep't of Parks & Recreation

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 17, 2024
5:23-cv-00341 NC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024)

Opinion

5:23-cv-00341 NC

04-17-2024

SHAWN RHODES, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION, and others, Defendants.


ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL Dkt. No. 45

NATHANAEL M. COUSINS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that no issue remains for the Court's determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the case, provided that such motion is filed within 60 days. All scheduled dates are VACATED.

The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 60 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rhodes v. Cal. Dep't of Parks & Recreation

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 17, 2024
5:23-cv-00341 NC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Rhodes v. Cal. Dep't of Parks & Recreation

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN RHODES, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 17, 2024

Citations

5:23-cv-00341 NC (N.D. Cal. Apr. 17, 2024)