From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhodes v. Cal. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 20, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-313-TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:13-cv-313-TLN-EFB

05-20-2013

ANDRE RHODES, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant.


ORDER

This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's request to vacate referral to the magistrate judge and for all further proceedings to be heard by the District Court. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 73(b)(3) provides that "[o]n its own for good cause—or when a party shows extraordinary circumstances—the district judge may vacate a referral to a magistrate judge."

(ECF 21.) The court finds that Plaintiff has not shown the "extraordinary circumstances" necessary to vacate referral to a magistrate judge. As such, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED.

____________

Troy L. Nunley

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Rhodes v. Cal. Dep't of Corr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 20, 2013
No. 2:13-cv-313-TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2013)
Case details for

Rhodes v. Cal. Dep't of Corr.

Case Details

Full title:ANDRE RHODES, Plaintiff, v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 20, 2013

Citations

No. 2:13-cv-313-TLN-EFB (E.D. Cal. May. 20, 2013)