From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhines v. Morgan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 13, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-238 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 13, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:13-cv-238

01-13-2014

ANTWAN RHINES, Petitioner, v. DONALD MORGAN, Warden Respondent.


JUDGE WALTER H. RICE


DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS

OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. #8); DISMISSING

PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. #2) WITH

PREJUDICE; JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF RESPONDENT AND

AGAINST PETITIONER; DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

AND LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FORMA PAUPERIS; TERMINATION ENTRY

On December 4, 2013, United States Magistrate Judge Michael Merz issued a Report and Recommendations, Doc. #8, recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Doc. #2, be dismissed with prejudice. Although the parties were notified of their right to file Objections to the Report and Recommendations, and of the consequences of failing to do so, and although Petitioner requested and was granted an extension of time in which to file Objections, Doc. #9 and 12/18/13 Notation Order, no Objections have been filed within the time allotted, and Petitioner has requested no further extensions of time.

Based on the reasoning and citations of authority set forth by United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz, in his December 4, 2013, Report and Recommendations, Doc. #8, as well as upon a thorough de novo review of this Court's file and the applicable law, this Court ADOPTS said judicial filing in its entirety. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, Doc. #2, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Given that Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and, further, that the Court's decision herein would not be debatable among reasonable jurists, and because any appeal from this Court's decision would be objectively frivolous, Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability, and is denied leave to appeal in forma pauperis.

Judgment will be entered in favor of Respondent and against Petitioner.

The captioned case is hereby ordered terminated upon the docket records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division, at Dayton.

__________

WALTER H. RICE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Rhines v. Morgan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION
Jan 13, 2014
Case No. 3:13-cv-238 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 13, 2014)
Case details for

Rhines v. Morgan

Case Details

Full title:ANTWAN RHINES, Petitioner, v. DONALD MORGAN, Warden Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 13, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:13-cv-238 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 13, 2014)