From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rhea v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 23, 2012
81 So. 3d 537 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. 4D11–3141.

2012-03-23

Frank V. RHEA, III, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and Publix Super Markets, Inc., Appellees.

Appeal from the State of Florida, Unemployment Appeals Commission; L.T. Case No. 11–8182.Frank V. Rhea, III, Sebastian, pro se. Amanda L. Neff, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Commission.


Appeal from the State of Florida, Unemployment Appeals Commission; L.T. Case No. 11–8182.Frank V. Rhea, III, Sebastian, pro se. Amanda L. Neff, Tallahassee, for appellee Unemployment Appeals Commission.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. “Whether [an] employee left [his or] her job voluntarily and without good cause is a question of fact within the province of the unemployment appeals referee.” Grossman v. Jewish Cmty. Ctr. of Greater Fort Lauderdale, Inc., 704 So.2d 714, 716 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). See also Augustin v. State Unemployment Appeals Comm'n, 906 So.2d 1238, 1239 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (appellate court must sustain referee's findings based upon credibility determinations supported by competent substantial evidence).

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Rhea v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
Mar 23, 2012
81 So. 3d 537 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Rhea v. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:Frank V. RHEA, III, Appellant, v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION and…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

Date published: Mar 23, 2012

Citations

81 So. 3d 537 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2012)