From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 27, 1989
549 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

No. 89-00111.

September 27, 1989.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Vincent E. Giglio, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Megan Olson, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Robert J. Krauss, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The appellant was adjudicated by the trial court to have committed a delinquent act, obstructing an officer without violence. We affirm that adjudication. In the order of adjudication, however, the appellant was placed on community control for an indeterminate time period. While a child may be committed to HRS for an indeterminate period of community control, the indeterminate period must not exceed the maximum term of imprisonment which the child could receive if he or she were an adult. § 39.11(4), Fla. Stat. (1987); C.P. v. State, 543 So.2d 867 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Since the maximum term of imprisonment for obstructing an officer without violence, as a first-degree misdemeanor, is one year, on remand the order must be modified to limit the period of community control to a period not exceeding one year. §§ 843.02, 775.082(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1987).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.

RYDER, A.C.J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.


Summaries of

R.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Sep 27, 1989
549 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

R.H. v. State

Case Details

Full title:R.H., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Sep 27, 1989

Citations

549 So. 2d 742 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1989)

Citing Cases

T.G. v. State

We find merit in her argument that the trial court erred in sentencing her to an indeterminate term of…

E.J. v. State

Appellant contends the trial court erred in failing to limit the term of community control to the maximum…