From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

R.F. v. Dept. of Children Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 17, 2004
889 So. 2d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Opinion

No. 5D04-1607.

December 17, 2004.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Marion County, S. Sue Robbins, J.

Carl S. New, Ocala, for Appellant.

Ralph J. McMurphy of the Department of Children and Families, Wildwood, for Appellee.


R.F., the mother of four minor children, appeals the trial court's order terminating her parental rights. Because we find no abuse of discretion on the part of the trial judge, we affirm.

R.F. does not challenge the grounds for the termination of her parental rights. Rather, she contends that termination was not the least restrictive means of protecting the children, because her father and stepmother, who live in Massachusetts, indicated at the adjudicatory hearing that they were willing to take the children.

Because parental rights implicate fundamental liberty interests, the Department of Children and Families must establish that termination is the least restrictive means available to protect the children from harm. See Dep't of Children Families v. L.D., 840 So.2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). The least restrictive means requirement dictates that measures short of termination should be used if those measures can permit the safe re-establishment of the parent-child bond. See Dep't of Children Families v. B.B., 824 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

The trial judge considered the offer of R.F.'s father and stepmother to care for the children, but found that, despite their good intentions, there was not a "realistic likelihood of a successful placement of the children" with them in the foreseeable future. She concluded, as a result, that R.F's father and stepmother were not available relatives for immediate placement of the children, and that the best interests of the children required the court to proceed with a permanent placement. As there is substantial, competent evidence to support the findings of the trial court, we find no error. See N.S.H. v. Florida Dep't of Children Family Servs., 843 So.2d 898 (Fla.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 950, 124 S.Ct. 388, 157 L.Ed.2d 282 (2003); C.B. v. Dep't of Children Families, 879 So.2d 82 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004).

AFFIRMED.

SAWAYA, CJ., and THOMPSON, J., concur.


Summaries of

R.F. v. Dept. of Children Families

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Dec 17, 2004
889 So. 2d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)
Case details for

R.F. v. Dept. of Children Families

Case Details

Full title:R.F., Mother of N.T., J.T., J.T. and J.T., etc., Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Dec 17, 2004

Citations

889 So. 2d 945 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

C.A.T. v. Dept. of Children

or termination of parental rights under section 39.806(1), Florida Statutes (2007), that termination is the…