From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rezek v. City of Tustin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 29, 2015
SACV11-01601 DOC (RNBx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2015)

Opinion


EDWARD REZEK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TUSTIN, BRIAN CHUPP #1069, MARK TURNER #1002, individually and as peace officers, SCOTT JORDAN, Chief of Police, IPC INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION, VESTAR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY, JOSE REYES, DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. No. SACV11-01601 DOC (RNBx) United States District Court, Central District of California January 29, 2015

          JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST EDWARD REZEK [216]

          HON. DAVID O. CARTER, United States District Judge

         TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

         This matter came on regularly for trial on January 5, 2015, in Courtroom 9D of the above-titled court, the Hon. David O. Carter, judge, presiding. Plaintiff Edward Rezek (hereinafter "Plaintiff") was represented by Thomas Beck of The Law Offices of Thomas Beck. Defendants City of Tustin, a public entity, Brian Chupp and Mark Turner, individually and as peace officers with the City of Tustin, a public entity (hereinafter referred to collectively as "Defendants") were represented by Robert L. Kaufman of Woodruff, Spradlin & Smart. All other parties to this action had been dismissed prior to trial.

         A jury was empanelled, and trial began, on January 5, 2015. A unanimous verdict in Defendants’ favor was arrived at and entered on January 13, 2015. A true and correct copy of the verdict is attached hereto as Exhibit "A." As a result of that trial and verdict, this Court orders as follows:

         1. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff;

         2. All other claims were either dismissed or adjudicated against Plaintiff as reflected in the Court's previous orders;

         3. Defendants may seek costs as the prevailing party consistent with Federal Rule 54 and Local Rule 54-2 and 54-3; and

         4. Defendants are to give notice of this judgment;

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Rezek v. City of Tustin

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jan 29, 2015
SACV11-01601 DOC (RNBx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Rezek v. City of Tustin

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD REZEK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF TUSTIN, BRIAN CHUPP #1069, MARK TURNER…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jan 29, 2015

Citations

SACV11-01601 DOC (RNBx) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 29, 2015)