From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. Valentine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

December, 1931.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Carswell, Scudder and Davis, JJ.


Motion for reargument of motion granted, and on reargument appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the ground that this appeal does not lie to this court from the City Court of New Rochelle. (Laws of 1927, chap. 531, § 596; Laws of 1931, chap. 499, § 138.)

See ante, p. 769. — [REP.

See Charter of City of New Rochelle (Laws of 1910, chap. 559), § 596, as added by Laws of 1927, chap. 531; New Rochelle City Court Act (Laws of 1931, chap. 499), § 138. — [REP.


Summaries of

Reynolds v. Valentine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 1, 1931
234 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Reynolds v. Valentine

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA REYNOLDS, Respondent, v. HENRY H. VALENTINE, JR., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 1, 1931

Citations

234 App. Div. 865 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)