From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. Strickland

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 3, 2010
363 F. App'x 394 (6th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-3098.

February 3, 2010.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.

Before: BATCHELDER, Chief Circuit Judge; SILER and SUTTON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER


The motion by the appellant, Mark Brown, for a stay of execution is denied, and the panel affirms the district court for the reasons set forth in the district court opinion, Reynolds (Brown) v. Strickland, No. 2:10-cv-27 (S.D.Ohio Feb. 2, 2010), and in our recent opinion in Cooey (Biros) v. Strickland, 589 F.3d 210 (6th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Reynolds v. Strickland

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 3, 2010
363 F. App'x 394 (6th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Reynolds v. Strickland

Case Details

Full title:Lawrence REYNOLDS, Plaintiff, Mark Brown, Intervenor-Appellant, v. Ted…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 3, 2010

Citations

363 F. App'x 394 (6th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Cooey v. Strickland

Brown did not prevail on appeal. The Sixth Circuit's Order provided that "the panel affirms the district…

In re Ohio Execution Protocol Litig.

Moving Defendants assert this Second Cause of Action is foreclosed by controlling precedent (Motion, ECF No.…