From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds v. Grain Belt Mills Company

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division One
Jan 4, 1934
69 S.W.2d 947 (Mo. 1934)

Opinion

January 4, 1934.

APPEAL AND ERROR: Jurisdiction. Where plaintiff obtained a verdict and judgment in the circuit court for more than $7,500 and remitted an amount sufficient to bring the judgment within that sum, the Court of Appeals had jurisdiction of the appeal though the remittitur was made for the purpose of giving that court jurisdiction.

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. — Hon. ____, Judge.

REMANDED TO THE KANSAS CITY COURT OF APPEALS.

Brown, Douglas Brown for appellant.

Stringfellow Garvey for respondent.


Action for damages for personal injuries. Judgment for $8000. Plaintiff remitted $600 of this amount and judgment was entered (including interest) for $7470.64, and costs.

On motion of defendant, the court made an order granting an appeal to the Supreme Court. Thereafter and during the same term the court set aside said order and granted the appeal to the Kansas City Court of Appeals. Defendant challenged the jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals, and that court made a finding that the plaintiff remitted said sum in the trial court for the purpose of depriving the Supreme Court of appellate jurisdiction. On this finding the Court of Appeals transferred the case to this court. [Reynolds v. Grain Belt Mills Co., 59 S.W.2d 744.] It did so by its certificate and judgment as follows:

"Now at this day, it appearing to the satisfaction of the court that the amount in dispute herein, exclusive of costs, exceeds the sum of seven thousand five hundred dollars, and that this court is without jurisdiction of this appeal, upon motion of the respondent, the court doth order and adjudge that this cause be and it is hereby certified and transferred to the Supreme Court."

On the record in this case the amount in dispute is the amount of the final judgment entered by the trial court. The amount so entered in said court fixed appellate jurisdiction in the Kansas City Court of Appeals. [Hensler v. Stix, 185 Mo. 238, 84 S.W. 894; Mathews v. Railroad, 231 Mo. 623, 132 S.W. 1074.]

The case should be remanded to the Kansas City Court of Appeals. It is so ordered. All concur.


Summaries of

Reynolds v. Grain Belt Mills Company

Supreme Court of Missouri, Division One
Jan 4, 1934
69 S.W.2d 947 (Mo. 1934)
Case details for

Reynolds v. Grain Belt Mills Company

Case Details

Full title:FRANK J. REYNOLDS v. GRAIN BELT MILLS COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court of Missouri, Division One

Date published: Jan 4, 1934

Citations

69 S.W.2d 947 (Mo. 1934)
69 S.W.2d 947

Citing Cases

Schepman v. Mutual Benefit Health and Acc. Assn

] We have no statute making an assignment a matter of defense in a situation of this kind. An examination of…