From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynolds & Reynolds Co. v. Superior Integrated Solutions, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 18, 2013
Case No.: 1:12-CV-848 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 18, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:12-CV-848

11-18-2013

REYNOLDS & REYNOLDS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS, INC., Defendant.


District Judge Thomas M. Rose

Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 56)

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman (doc. 56), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) has expired, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendation in full. It is therefore ORDERED that Defendant's motion for leave to file an amended counterclaim (Doc. 43) is DENIED AS MOOT.

____________

THOMAS M. ROSE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Reynolds & Reynolds Co. v. Superior Integrated Solutions, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
Nov 18, 2013
Case No.: 1:12-CV-848 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 18, 2013)
Case details for

Reynolds & Reynolds Co. v. Superior Integrated Solutions, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:REYNOLDS & REYNOLDS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. SUPERIOR INTEGRATED SOLUTIONS…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

Date published: Nov 18, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 1:12-CV-848 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 18, 2013)