From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynel v. Kelly

Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 795 (N.C. 1793)

Opinion

(1793.)

The original was in Devon, and the declaration in Exon, which is another county; it is error.

C. J. 14 Jac. rot., 340. Pollard and White's case was adjudged accordingly.


It is a fault in the original.

JONES and DODERIDGE, JJ., e contra. Here by the custos brevium it is certified that the declaration is on the writ. We cannot give judgment otherwise, for it does not appear to us. If it be certified, he may have an action on the case against the custos brevium. Antea, p. 712; postea, p. 803; 2 Cr., 674; 3 Cr., 287; Palm., 428; 2 Cr., 479.


Summaries of

Reynel v. Kelly

Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports
Jan 1, 1793
1 N.C. 795 (N.C. 1793)
Case details for

Reynel v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:*REYNEL v. KELLY. — Mich. 3 Car

Court:Court of King's Bench Latch's Reports

Date published: Jan 1, 1793

Citations

1 N.C. 795 (N.C. 1793)