From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reynaud v. Riverbed Tech.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 17, 2024
No. 24-CV-00700-SI (N.D. Cal. May. 17, 2024)

Opinion

24-CV-00700-SI

05-17-2024

BRIDGET MICHELLE REYNAUD, Plaintiff, v. RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Defendant.


ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING; CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

SUSAN ILLSTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

On May 17, 2024, the Court held a hearing on defendant's motion to compel arbitration. The Court indicated that it is inclined to deny the motion to Compel arbitration as to the Title VII Claims but grant the motion to Compel arbitration as to the California state law Claims. The parties discussed, but did not brief, the question of whether the Court must stay litigation on the Title VII Claims if the California state law Claims are sent to arbitration.

The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to file supplemental briefing on the question of a stay, where some Claims are subject to arbitration and some are not. Each side may file a brief not to exceed five pages. The briefs are due no later than May 31, 2024. The matter will then be taken under submission.

The Case management Conference Currently set for May 31 is CONTINUED to June 21, 2024, at 2:30 p.m. over Zoom.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Reynaud v. Riverbed Tech.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
May 17, 2024
No. 24-CV-00700-SI (N.D. Cal. May. 17, 2024)
Case details for

Reynaud v. Riverbed Tech.

Case Details

Full title:BRIDGET MICHELLE REYNAUD, Plaintiff, v. RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, LLC…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: May 17, 2024

Citations

No. 24-CV-00700-SI (N.D. Cal. May. 17, 2024)