In United States v. Capers, 971 F.2d 744 (1 Cir.1992) (Table), 1992 U.S.App. Lexis 9059 (1 Cir. Jan. 14, 1992), the evidence which was deemed sufficient to meet the burden of production included the deposit of $25,000 cash. 2004 WL 1635021, 1992 U.S.App. Lexis 9059, **7–8.
Summary of this case from United States v. CorreiaNo. 91-1859.
January 14, 1992.
D.P.R., 770 F.Supp. 58.
AFFIRMED
In United States v. Capers, 971 F.2d 744 (1 Cir.1992) (Table), 1992 U.S.App. Lexis 9059 (1 Cir. Jan. 14, 1992), the evidence which was deemed sufficient to meet the burden of production included the deposit of $25,000 cash. 2004 WL 1635021, 1992 U.S.App. Lexis 9059, **7–8.
Summary of this case from United States v. Correiastating that "[a]ppellant's claim of entitlement to a court hearing prior to the seizure of his property by the IRS is foreclosed by [Phillips]"
Summary of this case from U.S. v. ThomasFull title:Dias Reyes v. U.S
Court:United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit
Date published: Jan 14, 1992
Id. at 18. Both the district court and the First Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed this decision in all…
U.S. v. ThomasGiven that "[t]he constitutionality of the levy procedure . . . has long been settled," it is no wonder he…